You are worth more than a secret – or are you?

secretgraphic

You are worth more than a secret – or are you?

We are about to dive into a potentially divisive topic which may draw out angry reactions from some longstanding people in the industry.   The topic: industry secrets.

Discussing our industry secrets encompasses more than divulging price codes or supplier names. It’s about individuals and organizations talking openly about how our industry operates, the challenges facing it, and what the future might hold. Read nearly any industry message board and you’ll see complaints about end users having access to information that exists online.

Years ago, sales people in the Promotional Products Industry enjoyed having access to a private database of suppliers that was core to the value proposition.  Many distributor firms did not even share the supplier information with the sales person.  That same database still exists, but the secrecy of the information does not hold as much value as it once did. Today, nearly every industry sales person knows the product vendor and the net cost of the item. As more and more of this information becomes available online, does it put our industry at risk?

Look at www.promokitchen.org and our Facebook page www.facebook.com/promokitchen, and you’ll see that no credentials are required to view content.   The content on the site is directed at industry participants, but can also be accessed by buyers and the general public – Seth Godin even linked to content from our own Mark Graham.  Are vetted articles which mention supplier names and industry issues a threat to our industry?

In short, no. The world has moved from opacity to transparency and business – our industry included – has to move with the rest of the world.  Now, this does not mean that you should publish your actual cost, nor does it mean you should publish the contact details of your vendor for the items you are selling. It just means that by being so concerned with keeping everything confidential, you’re severely limiting your potential.

We, as an industry, have an obligation to broaden the conversation outside industry walls and advocate for our ad medium. We have to get the word out about our industry. We must become advocates and begin sharing openly at shows, universities, and various events to spark interest and attract top emerging talent. That means introducing suppliers to buyers at end user shows.  It means talking about industry challenges in an open forum so when buyers are searching for solutions they find credible information rather than settling for less, or giving up on the promotional products purchase completely. It means soliciting end user opinions so that we are better equipped to deliver to our clients what they want and need; and ultimately, it means building trust in the supply chain. That begins with closing the door on the fear and opening the door to transparency.

When distributors are willing to share information with the supplier such as end-user industry, budget, goal, challenge, and even client name, the supplier has a better opportunity to add value to the interaction and help close the sale. It is an opportunity for the supplier to prove they can be a trusted resource to the distributor and at the same time foster better outputs. Sharing this information allows all parties to deliver beyond expectations and provide better solutions to customers’ problems.  That kind of value is hard to compete with.

Distributors still choose to primarily buy from industry suppliers because suppliers add value beyond the secret of who the manufacturer is.  End buyers also choose to buy from industry distributors for this same reason, as well as for the additional services and quality of overall experience they receive. Suppliers choose to primarily sell through distributors because of the value the distributor brings to the supplier.  For example, distributors should be bringing the supplier correctly written purchase orders, clean artwork, a working knowledge of the systems and processes involved with producing orders, and the capability of marketing to, reaching, and converting a much larger pool of clients than if the supplier were to try to sell product to end buyers directly.  If distributors did not add value to the supplier they would be bypassed and end users would buy directly from suppliers. Instead, the supply chain exists as it does because of the value add and everyone wins.

PromoKitchen believes in fostering this type of respectful, intelligent conversation in an open forum.  We believe that best practice sharing is a good thing for an industry that is going through rapid change. We also believe in the power of community and see the potential this industry has to improve when stronger connections are established between us all. It is our intent to advance the industry through thought-provoking discussion on a variety of subjects (marketing, sales, technology, operations, productivity and creativity) and provide access to higher level information, education, mentorship and unique networking opportunities. The marketplace is growing, evolving, and changing, as is the competition.

Be open and learn from open sharing because if you are relying on your knowledge of “industry secrets” as your competitive advantage, whatever advantage you thought you had is gone.  There are bigger challenges ahead for our industry. Rather than trying to keep useful articles and dialog secret, engage openly online.  Your customers and vendors expect it. They know they are worth more than a secret. Are you?

Salt & Pepper #7 – Industry Compensation Models

SaltPepperHeader042315Welcome to Salt & Pepper! Salt & Pepper is basically the PromoKitchen equivalent of debate team. The purpose of this monthly article is to open up discussion and conversation on different challenges facing the Promotional Products Industry. In this edition of Salt & Pepper, Chef Kirby Hasseman and industry veteran Bill Petrie discuss the current industry compensation model for distributors.

What are your opinions? We welcome your comments!

NOTE: Salt & Pepper is intended to foster intelligent dialogue between professionals. This is not a dagger throwing contest. Be honest and authentic, but please also be kind and keep it classy.

—————————————————————————————————————————-

 

Salt – Kirby Hasseman

Let’s face it – The debate of how to best compensate employees or sales team is not a new one, and it’s not unique to our industry.  There is no magic recipe for the right way to do this.  If there was, we would all be using it.  I am also NOT a fan of doing things the way they always have been done just because they have been done that way.  We need to constantly be looking for new and better ways to do all things in business…including how we compensate our employees.

Here is why I think the traditional gross profit split is the best way to compensate sales executives:

It’s Entrepreneurial:  Being in any sales profession is a lot like being in business for yourself.  I have heard many speakers talk about sales pros as being the CEO of ME.  The current model is an entrepreneurial one.  Yes there is risk, but there is risk in any business.  There is a lot less risk in being a sales professional in promo!  If you get with a great organization, you have training, infrastructure, and support that you don’t have when starting your own business.  This allows you to grow a business for yourself and on your own terms.

It’s Fair to Both Sides:  The fact is, the cost of running a distributorship is continually rising.  There are more technology costs, software costs, etc. than ever before.  Most of the time, the “company” pays for many of those costs.  If you add a salary to your sales team as well, it can be a very steep hill to climb.  So some smaller distributorships just won’t add to their team.  On the other side, if the company pays a salary to a sales member there might be a “ceiling” on what they can earn, and that’s no good either.  That leads nicely to this…

It Pays for Effort and Results:  I believe in paying based on effort and results.  If you have worked around straight commission sales professionals, you KNOW when they are working.  You don’t need to check their hours.  You know because of their sales results.  I LOVE a profession where if I increase my effort, I can increase my pay.  I am much more likely to work harder and longer if I get to see results at the end!

It Improves Customer Service:  That’s right!  How many times have you heard “Customer Service is dead?”  In most instances that is because the person in “customer service” has no interest or investment into the customer being happy.  That is NOT the case if you are a commissioned sales person.  You have a vested interest in each order being done right!  That leads to happy customers and long term success.

As I said, I have found no perfect model.  And our traditional model makes it hard to recruit new team members.  But those that fit, really fit.  And with that model we can create long term team members that have no limit to what they can accomplish.

 

 

Pepper – Bill Petrie

For decades the conventional commission structure of equally splitting the gross profit on an order by order basis has been the industry norm. On the surface, it seems very simple: form a true partnership with the salesperson by paying 50% of the profit dollars while the company keeps the other half. However, when you peel back the layers of this compensation onion, you find that this type of commission structure heavily favors the salesperson over the business owner for the following reasons:

Business Environment:  When the traditional 50/50 split was first instituted, the business environment was radically different. Business owners today have higher overhead expenses than they did even 15 years ago: computers, high-speed internet, and cell phones to name a few. These additional costs come out of the pockets of the owner and are generally not shared by the distributor salesperson.

Rewarding the Wrong Behavior:  Distributors who pay 50% of the gross profit dollars are heavily rewarding top line revenue while minimizing the impact margins have on the overall health of the business.  By not factoring in the bottom line they do both parts of the partnership a disservice. A “sales at any cost” strategy is a recipe for short term gain over long term success.

Partnership Illusion:  The 50/50 commission split creates an imbalance that is far in favor of the distributor salesperson. When overhead and other aspects of owning a business are factored in, the actual “split” is more like 65/35 or 70/30 in favor of the distributor salesperson. That is not a partnership in any sense of the word.

I am all in favor of a commission-only model when it comes to sales, but not at the equal 50/50 split. Instead, I favor paying commission at a rate equal  to the gross profit on each order. For example, an order written at a 45% margin would pay a commission rate of 45% of the gross profit dollars. This type of model – and others like them – encourage the correct behaviors and create a true partnership that can yield long lasting results for both sides.

—————————————————————————————————————————-

Salary? 50/50 Split?  Splits based off of GP%?  Should industry compensation for distributors change? If so, how?

Pre-register for PK PowerUp! Chicago

prereg

Salt and Pepper #6 – Traditional Tradeshows vs. EME/Power Meeting

Sale&PepperHeaderWelcome to Salt & Pepper! Salt & Pepper is basically the PromoKitchen equivalent of debate team. The purpose of this monthly article is to open up discussion and conversation on different challenges facing the Promotional Products Industry. In this edition of Salt & Pepper, Chef Kirby Hasseman and industry veteran Bill Petrie discuss the pros and cons of different industry tradeshow events.

What are your opinions? We welcome your comments!

NOTE: Salt & Pepper is intended to foster intelligent dialogue between professionals. This is not a dagger throwing contest. Be honest and authentic, but please also be kind and keep it classy.

—————————————————————————————————————————-

 

Salt – Kirby Hasseman

I am a huge proponent of industry events…no matter what they are!  I have said many times that when I invest the time (and money) to go to an industry event, I come back energized,  focused, and reminded about why I love this business!  The EME style events are fantastic opportunities, and I am not just saying that because I want to be invited back (Hint, hint.  Nudge, nudge).  :)  But since the point of this exercise is to take a side, I find myself arguing between two great things.  Here we go!

Here are the positives of Industry Trade Shows:

Networking Opportunities:  So many of us go to trade shows looking for “the new idea” and that’s cool.  Often trade shows are a great place to find that, but I think the best things about  trade shows is they can be a great place to network with new contacts and old friends.

Lower Cost of Entry:  Though there is certainly a great cost for suppliers at shows, I think the cost of a show is less.  That is certainly the case for distributors which means you get more participation, which can be great.  The exclusive nature of the EME is fantastic, but I want to expose my new sales team members to products and suppliers too.  Shows can be the perfect way to get them started!

Ability to Bolt:  Let’s face it, sometimes suppliers and distributors are not a good fit for each other and that’s ok. At a trade show, one of you can make that decision and move on and spend your time elsewhere.  This can be both a negative and a positive, but no one wants to waste a lot of time on something that is just not working.

New Products:  Trade shows have always been a great way to roll-out new products for suppliers.  That makes is great for distributors to see a lot of “new things” in a short period of time!

Additional Education:  I think the best shows are the ones that offer some level of education.  This additional education helps to create more learned sales people, salespeople who are in the perfect position to become next year’s EME participants!

Personal Note:  I understand the exclusivity of the EME is the point of the event.  This way (by limiting the invitations to distributors with $500,000 in sales) the suppliers know they are seeing “top notch” distributors.  That’s totally cool, but would love to see a “Triple A” EME event. This would allow sales people doing $250,000 to be invited.  As salespeople grow, they are the next superstars, and attendance at these kinds of events might help springboard their growth.  I’ve actually spent the last couple of years saying “we don’t need more trade shows.”  I bet you have too, but this year I have personally had challenges finding shows to attend and I miss them!

Though I know trade shows are a lot of work (and a big expense!), I think the traditional trade show still plays an important role in our industry.

Pepper – Bill Petrie

First of all, I don’t want anyone to take away from the below perspective that industry trade shows are bad – they aren’t.  In fact, there’s a lot to like about the current trade show model including the opportunity to network, take part in education, and the ability to see the newest merchandise suppliers have to offer.

I do, however, think that the EME model has something different to offer both suppliers and distributors. The key advantage EME brings to the table is the format: prior to the event date, private one-on-one meetings are scheduled between distributors and suppliers. Each meeting session is 20 minutes of uninterrupted time. There are many advantages to this style:

Getting Granular: At traditional trade shows, it can be difficult to get a few minutes of direct communication with a supplier representative. The ability to have a scheduled meeting where the supplier and distributor can take a deep dive into future growth or a specific project is invaluable.

Focus: When you do manage to get a few minutes with a supplier at a traditional show, there are others around seeking the attention of the same individual supplier which creates an enormous amount of distraction. The EME format allows singular focus which can provide the necessary communication to drive sales and solve distributor end-user challenges. The advantage to the distributor is that keeps them from falling into their comfort zone of seeing the same suppliers. Instead, EME forces the discomfort of conversations that normally wouldn’t take place – and that’s a good thing. I know one distributor who had over $30,000.00 in sales because of a conversation that took place at EME with a supplier this person hadn’t previously known about.

Exclusivity:  The fact that both distributor and supplier attendees must be invited brings a sense of urgency to the proceedings. Ask anyone who has attended an EME event and they will tell you that ideas flow and business gets done at a much higher level and faster rate than at a traditional show. Suppliers know they are only speaking with distributors that have at least $500,000.00 in annual sales that have the potential to create a tremendous return on both investment and experience.

To be clear, both EME and traditional shows play an important role in connecting suppliers and distributors. Like Kirby, I’m a supporter of just about any industry event that connects distributors, suppliers, and service providers. However, as it becomes increasingly difficult to truly engage each other on a busy show floor, EME provides an avenue to make deeper connections. Perhaps it’s time both PPAI and ASI look at incorporating some EME features into their events.

—————————————————————————————————————————-

How do you feel about trade shows and EME events? Do you find value in attending? And, outside of education and walking the show floor, what types of events do you seek out to network with other professionals?

PK Podcast #84 – Tonia Allen Gould

In today’s PK Podcast episode,  chefs Mark Graham, co-founder of commonsku and Danny Rosin, President of Brand Fuel get the chance to speak with one of the industry’s most energetic, creative and adventurous entrepreneurs, Tonia Allen Gould.

Tonia is the owner/founder of Tagsource, an award-winning, consumer promotions and marketing agency.  With a creative, client-centric approach to brand development, TAG! builds unique promotional marketing campaigns that assists its clients in taking their products or services to an enlightened consumer in a rapidly changing media environment.  Outside of her distributor business, Tonia is also a published  author, having written a fabulous children’s picture book, Samuel T. Moore of Corte Magore in 2013. Tonia has turned her book into a full fledged social initiative with the launch of the “Finding Corte Magore” project. Finding Corte Magore works virtually to connect a global community of professionals, students, and crowdfunders to aid the educationally and economically repressed country of Nicaragua.

Mark and Danny speak to Tonia about what it takes to be a creative distributor in 2015, finding meaning in one’s work, and how to successfully tackle a side project and turn it into a force for positive change.

ppai tag

Photo courtesy of JennKL Photography |  Los Angeles, CA

Reprogramming Retail | Repost from Inc. w/ commentary

Charity here. I’ve long preached in offline conversations that our industry would grow exponentially if we could as a collective, figure out a way to be nimble and agile enough to keep pace with the constantly evolving demands of the retail marketplace.  If this were to occur, our end-user clients could ideally charge retail or better prices for goods they are most often instead giving away for free. And what more does it then do for their brand when they trade such an item for loyalty?

When value isn’t an issue, price isn’t a question. There is never a question about the value of a retail product when it’s hot. And, when it’s no longer the thing to have, there is something hotter with as just as much perceived value to take its place.  I dream of a day when we as an industry are no longer struggling to play catch up and can in turn, stop clawing like cats and dogs to earn ever-shrinking margins.

Second only to the ability to stay on trend, another challenge the retail world is working to figure out is the how-to on marrying the traditional, high-touch/human-to-human interaction sales model with the efficiency of an eCommerce transaction. A few companies are beginning to figure it out and it would be well with us to quickly adopt and adapt this model to fit our industry.

This piece from Inc. nails it for me.  So maybe it won’t be amazon that cracks the code in our world, but it will be someone.

“Never in the history of retail has the opportunity to build a brand been better…”  and never in the history of branded merchandise has the door been so wide open for someone to come in an make a mark so big it stirs the prepared, challenging them to rise to the occasion, and paralyzes others, leaving them no choice but to wonder how on Earth their iceberg melted.

 

Distributors: Please Quit B***ng About The Online Competition

distributors
I read the following post on an industry discussion group  this week and it compelled me to write this tough love piece. All of this has been written from the vantage of someone who started a distributorship 17 years ago and deals with online competitors all the time.

 

 Offline Distributor/33 Years Industry Experience writes: “It’s happened twice today. Lost a small order of beach balls to an online distributor selling them for $.87 each in the 100 quantity with a larger imprint area than I’ve found for twice the price and with 2-day production and a $20 set-up. Have a request for a quote for 2,000 folding can coolers with a 3-color imprint (one side). The customer says in the past they paid $.60 each for them from a national chain that doesn’t specialize in promotional products and they say they received them in 5 days. After 33 years in business I feel completely out of the loop with my Sage, my catalogs, and even my favorite EQP suppliers. Where are they finding these prices? I have a sample of the can cooler imprinted in three colors (sublimation) and it’s a really nice one so I can’t complain about the competitor’s quality!”

 

My message is plain and simple: The train has left the station on “price is everything/transaction” orders. Please stop complaining about online competitors as if you’re the victim. You are better to spend your time focusing on creating a better business model.

If you’re the kind of distributor that sells to customers who check online first, chances are you do not have a differentiated business model, nor do you bring any real value to the table. Your business is in real jeopardy as you will not win against the big online distributors (popular whipping boys include 4imprint.com or discountmugs.com). They are hyper efficient businesses, with millions of dollars invested in their web sites. They are exceptionally run and you stand zero chance of competing with them as soon as you get an email like this. Yes, even if you have a cookie cutter SAGE or ESP site – you cannot compete in the online space against 4imprint.

It also doesn’t matter that you “have been in business for 33 years,” “have relied on SAGE,” or “your preferred EQP suppliers.” None of this is relevant  in this online segment of the industry. The industry was very straight forward 33 years ago. The only way to buy beach balls was to order them from your friendly distributor who placed their order with their friendly neighborhood supplier. Back then, the value added by the distributor was to find a beach ball (through SAGE/ESP) buy it from your supplier (at EQP) and drop ship the order to your customer. Today, that value proposition is much too quaint for the savvy buyer who can simply buy online.

Let’s now pretend you’re the customer. You are looking for the hottest book for summer 2015. Chances are you need it fast and cheap. If you are like most people today, you go online and search for the best deal as the product is exactly the same at every bookstore. Why not just buy it from the cheapest place? This is exactly what’s happening to this segment of the promotional products industry. It’s going online, and it’s never coming back. Customers are demanding this and they are voting with their wallets. If the experience of buying online was lousy, they’d be sticking with their distributors. In a free market, the customer is in charge.

Now, the news is not all bad here. Let me take a moment to unpack the two problems here.

Problem #1 – Your Cheapo, Price Shopping Client

You face two choices here.

1. Get rid of this client as they value price above everything else and you cannot – I repeat, you cannot – build a sustainable business by cutting your margins (you can if you are Amazon, but you are not Amazon). If you play this game, you will be stressed out and you will have a client base that will cut bait as soon as you increase your prices. You will also continue to post these “the sky is falling” kind of posts on industry forums and the process will repeat itself again.

2. Sit down with the client and dig deep into what they are looking for. Why do they need this particular product? What sort of event are they planning? What marketing objective are they looking to achieve? What demographic are they serving? What does a successful campaign look like to them? By understanding the answers to these questions, you will figure out whether you can help them achieve a higher goal other than saving 7 cents on a koozie order. Now, if they stare at you blankly after you ask these questions and answer “I know what I need and I just need it cheap. Can you match the online price?”

If this is the case, your answer back needs to be “Thank you for this opportunity. I encourage you to buy the product online.” Close the door on this and pursue another client that values what you bring to the table.

Problem #2 – That Pesky Online Competitor With Prices Too Good To Be True

Most of us are familiar with the story about David and Goliath. David was a regular shepherd and Goliath was a huge soldier capable of squashing David with his pinky toe. We all know what happens in the end: David is triumphant as he slings his stone at Goliath’s forehead, and the monstrous soldier is beaten. (Side note: suggested reading)

It’s the same thing here. If you play 4imprint’s game, they will crush you. They are optimized for low prices and the efficient processing of orders and they are the best in the world at this model. As a small independent distributor, or even a distributor working for a national franchise with access to “good, off EQP pricing” you stand little chance, unless you play the low margin game. 4imprint and their ilk are relentlessly efficient juggernauts that have won the price/transaction game. Good for them.

But ….

You can beat the online competition by moving up the food chain and differentiating your business with one or all of the following services.

– Unique design services (not art clean up, but original graphic design services)
– Fulfillment and kitting services
– E-commerce stores (beautifully designed on demand stores, not necessarily the huge company store programs as they have margin challenges of their own)
– Content marketing and social media services
– Event planning
– Selling complementary product lines like packaging or print products
– An incredible experience of working with your distributorship (i.e. delight them with your efficient processes)
– A consultative based approach where you dig deep into what they are trying to accomplish. Sell them an ROI on their promotion, don’t sell them a cheap widget.
– Create a unique brand for your distributorship so you stand out. Make a statement about who you are beyond just offering low prices and good service.

Online competitors can’t compete here as these services are not scalable and scale is what they look for in their quest for efficiency and low prices. If you can change the game, you have access to a whole new market.

In closing, I want to draw an analogy between our industry and the travel industry. Expedia put many travel agents out of business when they launched in the late 90s. And I believe that was a good thing for customers. Who wants to call up someone to book an economy flight to Chicago when they can do the same thing less expensively and 100x faster online? Thank you Expedia!

However, look at the segment of niche/agency based travel companies flourishing today. A great example is G Adventures. They offer experience based trips to adventure oriented travelers willing to pay for the experience. You can’t buy these trips on Expedia, and even if you could, I suspect most people would prefer G Adventures because they hold your hand through the process as they are experts at this type of travel.

The travel industry has seen huge growth over the last 15 years and two types of companies are growing in parallel – the cheap online players that focus on plane tickets and hotel rooms, and the experience based agencies that provide the hotel rooms and plane tickets along with an experience of a lifetime.

It comes down to this: Know your customer’s dreams, understand your competitor’s weaknesses and focus on your key point of differentiation. If you stay relentlessly focused on these three areas, you will build a profitable and sustainable business, in spite of the online competition.

Mark Graham is the founder of RIGHTSLEEVE and co-founder of commonsku. You can reach him on Twitter at @heymarkgraham. And if you’ve ever complained about your online competitor, he wants to hear from you. Ping him: mark [at] commonsku.com

PK Podcast #83 – Jacques Panis, Shinola

In this episode of the PK Podcast, Mark Graham and fellow chef Robert Fiveash speak with the leader of one of America’s most interesting and bravest new companies, Shinola.

Today’s guest is also a promotional products alumnus, a former employee of Brand Fuel no less, and he speaks to us on how his time in the industry prepared him for a career in retail and brand building.

With over 10 years of experience spanning marketing, branding, and sales, Jacques Panis joined Shinola in 2010 to direct the company’s product development and strategic direction. In 2013, he became President. Prior to Shinola, Jacques served as a founding member of Webosaurs and led the interactive division at the Dallas-based animation studio, Reel FX.

For the uninitiated, Shinola is based in Detroit and is dedicated to producing American built products. Shinola manufacturers and sells its own line of watches, bicycles, leather goods, and journals of the highest possible quality.

Consider the Cost of Bidding

valueThis article was written with the end user in mind by PromoKitchen Chef Kirby Hasseman of Hasseman Marketing

When creating a promotional campaign, you want a creative powerful promotion that will wow customers and affect human behavior.  That is what a great Promotional Products campaign can do…affect change.  The best campaigns can create an increase in direct mail opens, engagement on social media, create a safer work place or increase sales!

But in addition to making sure you create a campaign that “hits the mark,” most organizations want to make sure they are getting a fair shake on price.  No one wants to over pay…and no one wants to be taken advantage of!   So many organizations create a bidding process to ensure the best price.  While this is understandable, in theory, it’s important to consider the cost of such a campaign.

Yes…there is a cost.

First, it’s important to note that if the first part of this equation is NOT true (you have an effective promotional campaign), then the second part (the cost) really doesn’t matter.  You are now just spending money to spend it.  No good would come from that…agreed?

So if you have a trusted promotional advisor then their job is to help you create those effective campaigns.  The best relationships like this are like partnerships.  You share the themes, goals, and budget with them (if you don’t create them together) and they provide you ideas that help you reach those goals.  It’s a win-win, because you get great ideas (hopefully) and they get the business.

But when you take their creative concepts and bid them out on the individual products, it’s a different relationship entirely.  The relationship becomes entirely transactional.  That is fine (if that’s what you want) but you start to rob yourself of the value of the advisor.

If you take their ideas and bid them out, they are not likely to bring you ideas again.  And if they do, they won’t put the time and effort into them.  After all, you have told them (by your actions) that the ideas are not what you value.  So they may decide not to provide you ideas at all.

“Let me know when you decide what you want,” they might say.  “Then we will be glad to provide a bid.”

What does that mean, in dollars and cents?

Let’s say your hourly rate is $15 per hour.  In order to get a creative and effective promotional campaign, you could easily spend a day looking for ideas.  Then you might spend another day going through bids to make sure they are accurate (and comparing apples to apples).  So that’s two days of your time.  In most cases, pricing between competitive promotional distributors is going to be close.  So you might save a nickel per piece.  If you ordered 1000 of whatever promotional item you decide on, you have “saved” $50.  But you spent $240 to do it.

Of course this does not factor in your creativity.  It doesn’t call to attention that a good partner is probably attending industry shows (and seeing the latest and greatest promotional items) and you are not.

But at the end of the day, you have lost a free, trusted, creative, outside source.  It’s a choice, and it’s yours to make.  Of course if you don’t have that trusted source, that’s a different conversation.  But if you do, you might be wise not to drive them away.

So just ask yourself…what is your time worth?

Salt & Pepper V – The Next Big Industry Shift

Sale&PepperHeaderWelcome to Salt & Pepper! Salt & Pepper is basically the PromoKitchen equivalent of debate team. The purpose of this monthly article is to open up discussion and conversation on different challenges facing the Promotional Products Industry. In this edition of Salt & Pepper, Chef Kirby Hasseman and industry veteran Bill Petrie the next industry shift.

Who are your opinions? We welcome your comments!

NOTE: Salt & Pepper is intended to foster intelligent dialogue between professionals. This is not a dagger throwing contest. Be honest and authentic, but please also be kind and keep it classy.

—————————————————————————————————————————-

Salt:  Kirby Hasseman

The one constant thing in the universe…is change.

With change happening throughout the business world as fast as it is (and has been for the last 10 years), it’s tough to predict “the next big thing.”  The one certainty is change.  So as I put on my silly hat and look into the crystal ball, here are the big changes I see in the industry over the next 24 months:

Apparel Moves (More) to one P.O. –   I know.  I know.  This has already begun.  My prediction is this continues to increase.  More and more apparel suppliers will continue to create in house decoration.  Though established (and strong) decorators will remain strong.  Many of the lesser decorators will shrink market share, or go away completely.  Suppliers that are only wholesalers of blank goods will see a shrink in market share as well.  

Manufacturing Moves from China –   With the safety, pollution, and quality issues that have been seen in China, more suppliers will move to get manufacturing away from China.  This does not necessarily mean these manufacturing jobs will come back to the United States.  However, with proper credit to Jonathan Isaacson (from Gemline), these are not necessarily jobs we want. 

At SkuCon this year Jonathan asked the crowd, “How many of you have children, grandchildren, nieces, nephews, or even kids that you like?”  Nearly everyone in the audience raised their hands.  “How many of you want them to work in a sewing factory?”  No hands.  Wow.

I do, however, think that this shift will create an environment where, with the right product and process, North American made products can become more economically viable.

Two Distinct Ways to Buy:  Finally, I think the ways for consumers to buy promotional products will divide more distinctly over the next two years.  More and more “traditional” distributorships will feel the need to provide comprehensive marketing solutions.  In addition, more great e-commerce companies will enter the market as well.  These are two totally different ways of going to market and therefore two distinct lanes for consumers to engage in business with our industry.   Over the next two years, the middle of the road will be littered with distributors that simply can’t compete.

Time to pick a lane!

Pepper:  Bill Petrie

Our industry has evolved dramatically in the past 20 years. From email replacing fax as the preferred method of communication to the continued consolidation of distributors, change is always on the horizon. The challenge, of course, if to anticipate the next major industry shift. From my perspective, I believe the next jolt to our industry  will be when a major (and trusted) online retailer invests the necessary resources to enter and excel in our marketplace.

The old adage states that people by from people they know, like, and trust. In the Internet age, I believe this statement resonates more than ever today – with one addition: people buy from people and companies they know, like, and trust.

In only 20 years, Amazon has evolved from a simple online retailer of books to the biggest online store on Earth. With seemingly infinite product selection and what is generally regarded as the best customer experience anywhere, what happens when Amazon decides to get into the promotional products business?

Laugh if you want, but with $20B in revenue and no true dominant distributor, Amazon (or another trused, forward-thinking online retailer) will enter our marketplace and attempt to disrupt the supply chain. If you think it won’t happen, look back 20 years at the office products industry. There were several large suppliers (Daisytek, Azerty, Corporate Express) providing wholesale office products to to smaller “mom and pop” stores in local communities. These stores would in turn resell the products to the end user.  Does this model sound familiar?

Fast forward 20 years and there is one true office supply company remaining: Staples. Through acquisition and pricing pressure, they disrupted the marketplace and eliminated the local office store, destroying the supply chain. The office products space has become so commoditized that personal service became unimportant and price became king.

I’m not suggesting that Amazon entering the promotional products marketplace will yield these same results – our business has too much foundation built on customization and relationship. However,  it will cause significant marketplace disruption. People already know, like, and trust Amazon and one Amazon figures out how to create a client experience focused on our industry’s model, the supply chain will be more than rattled. In addition,  it will be a whole new world when Amazon figures out how to deliver promotional products by drone.

YOUR TWO CENTS: What are your thoughts on the next big industry shift?  One PO apparel orders? Amazon making a play in our marketplace? Middle of the road distributors being all but phased out? None or all of the above?  Join the conversation!